Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video823 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lab Leak results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 32.2% saturation with 1,061 hits. Analysis detected 5,387 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,292 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (8,016 of 37,536 keywords). This Lab Leak is worse (more manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group.
Lab Leak
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
79%Lab Leak (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,292
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

79% percentile
025507510078.6% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 32.2%32.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.1%7.1%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Keyword 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 32.2%, sitewide 7.5%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 0.4%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos