Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 906 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kurt Busch results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Recency Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 304 hits . Analysis detected 2,286 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,752 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (33,717 of 37,371 keywords). This Kurt Busch is better (less manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Kurt Busch
Keyword details
Total words: 4,752
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst