Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 789 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ku Basketball results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 709 hits . Analysis detected 3,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,367 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of â 77% (8,976 of 37,533 keywords). This Ku Basketball is worse (more manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Ku Basketball
Keyword details
Total words: 2,367
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.1% percentile 4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.8% 27.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 29.9% 29.9% Circular Reasoning Sitewide 0.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 29.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.6% Red Herring: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.7% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst