Keyword summary
77%1 analyzed article/video980 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kosability results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 452 hits. Analysis detected 2,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,940 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,102 of 37,536 keywords). This Kosability is better (less manipulative) than 56.20% of the peer group.
Kosability
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
44%Kosability (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,940
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

44% percentile
025507510043.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 15.4%15.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos