Keyword summary
79%1 analyzed article/video856 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Knox Jolie Pitt results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 318 hits. Analysis detected 2,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,568 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (14,316 of 34,797 keywords). This Knox Jolie Pitt is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Knox Jolie Pitt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
59%Knox Jolie Pitt (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,568
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

59% percentile
025507510058.9% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 10.5%10.5%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos