Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,625 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kling 2 5 results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 3.3% saturation with 217 hits. Analysis detected 1,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 1% (37,281 of 37,536 keywords). This Kling 2 5 is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
Kling 2 5
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
1%Kling 2 5 (selected)1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

1% percentile
02550751000.7% percentile
0.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos