Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Khosla Family results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 92 hits. Analysis detected 1,093 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,608 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 35,690 keywords). This Khosla Family is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Khosla Family
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
⁠0%Khosla Family (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,608
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos