Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Kevin Deanna results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.3% saturation with 922 hits . Analysis detected 5,485 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,144 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Kevin Deanna is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Kevin Deanna
Keyword details
Total words: 3,144
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 29.3% 29.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 29.0% 29.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 18.0% 18.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 29.0%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst