Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 641 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ketamine Queen results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 318 hits . Analysis detected 2,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,564 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of â 61% (14,724 of 37,763 keywords). This Ketamine Queen is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group. Ketamine Queen
Keyword details
Total words: 2,564
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.0% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.0% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Red Herring: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst