Keyword summary
23% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,407 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ken Houston results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 386 hits . Analysis detected 3,014 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,070 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 18% (31,020 of 37,536 keywords). This Ken Houston is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group. Ken Houston
Keyword details
Total words: 5,070
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst