Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video808 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keeping Families Together Act results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 183 hits. Analysis detected 1,354 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,232 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠14% (32,486 of 37,536 keywords). This Keeping Families Together Act is better (less manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group.
Keeping Families Together Act
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠14%Keeping Families Together Act (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,232
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510013.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos