Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,109 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Bus Fare results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Loss Aversion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 254 hits. Analysis detected 1,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,436 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,605 of 37,536 keywords). This Kansas City Bus Fare is better (less manipulative) than 97.50% of the peer group.
Kansas City Bus Fare
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
3%Kansas City Bus Fare (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,436
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

3% percentile
02550751002.5% percentile
1.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.9%0.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos