Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,182 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City Art Walks results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Indoctrination , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27% saturation with 958 hits . Analysis detected 4,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,546 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.1% and a BS Rank of 81% (7,191 of 37,536 keywords). This Kansas City Art Walks is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group. Kansas City Art Walks
Keyword details
Total words: 3,546
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.8% percentile 5.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 27.0% 27.0% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 19.4% 19.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 27.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 19.4%, sitewide 6.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.9% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst