Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Samuel Alito results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 3,630 hits . Analysis detected 20,804 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,263 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,867 of 37,536 keywords). This Justice Samuel Alito is worse (more manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group. Justice Samuel Alito
Keyword details
Total words: 9,263
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.7% percentile 5.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 39.2% 39.2% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 28.5% 28.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.9% 24.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 39.2%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 28.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst