Keyword summary
⁠12%1 analyzed article/video332 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julio Sosa Celis results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 151 hits. Analysis detected 671 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,328 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (14,766 of 37,536 keywords). This Julio Sosa Celis is worse (more manipulative) than 60.70% of the peer group.
Julio Sosa Celis
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠61%Julio Sosa Celis (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,328
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510060.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 3.7%3.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 4.4%4.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos