Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 7,838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Julian Nicks results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 3,643 hits . Analysis detected 22,349 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,651 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,393 of 35,110 keywords). This Julian Nicks is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. Julian Nicks
Keyword details
Total words: 25,651
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles25.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.1% 9.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Red Herring: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
STLPR 0% 5/11/2026, 10:00:00 AM