Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,051 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jules Boykoff results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.1% saturation with 1,013 hits. Analysis detected 5,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (11,871 of 37,276 keywords). This Jules Boykoff is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group.
Jules Boykoff
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠69%Jules Boykoff (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,204
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510068.2% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 24.1%24.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.6%4.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 23.0%23.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos