Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Judith Sheldon results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 1,165 hits . Analysis detected 2,838 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,120 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,832 keywords). This Judith Sheldon is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Judith Sheldon
Keyword details
Total words: 4,120
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 28.3% 28.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Halo Effect: Keyword 28.3%, sitewide 6.7% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst