Keyword summary
99%1 analyzed article/video675 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Interpretation results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Straw Man, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 45.6% saturation with 924 hits. Analysis detected 5,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,025 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,354 of 34,787 keywords). This Judicial Interpretation is worse (more manipulative) than 93.20% of the peer group.
Judicial Interpretation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
94%Judicial Interpretation (selected)9%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,025
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

93% percentile
025507510093.2% percentile
9.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 45.6%45.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 37.7%37.7%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 27.3%27.3%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 21.5%21.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 13.9%13.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.0%17.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 45.6%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 37.7%, sitewide 1.4%Straw Man: Keyword 27.3%, sitewide 0.9%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 21.5%, sitewide 2.2%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos