Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video220 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Judicial Decisions results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 83% saturation with 730 hits. Analysis detected 3,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (746 of 37,536 keywords). This Judicial Decisions is worse (more manipulative) than 98.00% of the peer group.
Judicial Decisions
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠98%Judicial Decisions (selected)16%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 880
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

98% percentile
025507510098.0% percentile
15.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles880 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 83.0%83.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 75.8%75.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 32.8%32.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 37.0%37.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 19.6%19.6%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Keyword 17.1%17.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 17.9%17.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 83.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 75.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 37.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 32.8%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 2.2%Personal Incredulity: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Horn Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos