Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordanian Air Force results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and In-Group Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 56.8% saturation with 890 hits . Analysis detected 3,490 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,567 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of 94% (2,204 of 35,445 keywords). This Jordanian Air Force is worse (more manipulative) than 93.80% of the peer group. Jordanian Air Force
Keyword details
Total words: 1,567
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.8% percentile 9.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 56.8% 56.8% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 17.5% 17.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 22.3% 22.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.8% 27.8% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 56.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 22.3%, sitewide 11.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 3.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.0% No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst