Keyword summary
â 78% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,561 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordan Peterson results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Biased Writer Voice , and Ad Hominem , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 812 hits . Analysis detected 6,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,006 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of â 34% (39,487 of 59,653 keywords). This Jordan Peterson is better (less manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group. Jordan Peterson
Keyword details
Total words: 9,006
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.1% Straw Man: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst