Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video 416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jordan Love results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 40.2% saturation with 502 hits . Analysis detected 3,645 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of ā 94% (2,276 of 34,426 keywords). This Jordan Love is worse (more manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. Jordan Love
Keyword details
Total words: 1,248
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
93% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 93.4% percentile 9.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 40.2% 40.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 28.7% 28.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 39.5% 39.5% Fundamental Attribution Eā¦ Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 13.8% 13.8% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 18.6% 18.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 27.0% 27.0% Blind-Spot Bias Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 40.2%, sitewide 4.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 39.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 28.7%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.0%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 8.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 0.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 6.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 0.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Horn Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.0% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Middle Ground: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.1% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst