Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,176 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jonathan Rinderknecht results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 786 hits . Analysis detected 3,836 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,664 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (24,708 of 35,675 keywords). This Jonathan Rinderknecht is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group. Jonathan Rinderknecht
Keyword details
Total words: 5,664
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.7% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst