Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jonathan David results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.9% saturation with 1,016 hits . Analysis detected 4,229 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,252 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Jonathan David is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jonathan David
Keyword details
Total words: 4,252
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.9% 23.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst