Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These John Le Carre results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 560 hits . Analysis detected 3,696 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This John Le Carre is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. John Le Carre
Keyword details
Total words: 6,180
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.4% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst