Keyword summary
85% 2 analyzed articles/videos 613 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Hickenlooper results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 537 hits . Analysis detected 3,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,685 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 54% (17,562 of 37,536 keywords). This John Hickenlooper is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group. John Hickenlooper
Keyword details
Total words: 3,685
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
53% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 53.2% percentile 3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.6% 14.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst