Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These John Doe results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 251 hits . Analysis detected 2,003 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,129 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,533 keywords). This John Doe is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. John Doe
Keyword details
Total words: 3,129
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.6% Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst