Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Diehl results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anchoring Bias , and Horn Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 74% saturation with 302 hits . Analysis detected 1,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of 99% (439 of 37,536 keywords). This John Diehl is worse (more manipulative) than 98.80% of the peer group. John Diehl
Keyword details
Total words: 408
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
99% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 98.8% percentile 18.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles408 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–100%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 74.0% 74.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 63.7% 63.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 26.2% 26.2% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Keyword 21.6% 21.6% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.1% 20.1% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% 80% 80% 100% 100% Negativity Bias: Keyword 74.0%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 63.7%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 26.2%, sitewide 4.0% Horn Effect: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 1.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 9.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 2.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 0.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst