Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 264 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John David Schwallier results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 87 hits . Analysis detected 482 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,056 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 59% (15,490 of 37,536 keywords). This John David Schwallier is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. John David Schwallier
Keyword details
Total words: 1,056
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.7% percentile 3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst