Keyword summary
97% 3 analyzed articles/videos 690 analyzed words
BS Summary: These John Connolly results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 20.9% saturation with 1,194 hits . Analysis detected 9,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,706 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,810 of 37,536 keywords). This John Connolly is worse (more manipulative) than 71.20% of the peer group. John Connolly
Keyword details
Total words: 5,706
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.2% percentile 4.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 20.9% 20.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.3% 9.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 26.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 20.9%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.7% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 0.4% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 4.0% Red Herring: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst