Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,050 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joel Embiid Sixers Title Hopes Mike Gansey Summer League Comments results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 450 hits. Analysis detected 3,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (16,749 of 37,536 keywords). This Joel Embiid Sixers Title Hopes Mike Gansey Summer League Comments is worse (more manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Joel Embiid Sixers Title Hopes Mike Gansey Summer League Comments
Keyword details
Total words: 4,200
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510055.4% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos