Keyword summary
96% 1 analyzed article/video 957 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Joe Johnston results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 1,120 hits . Analysis detected 4,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,871 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,086 of 37,536 keywords). This Joe Johnston is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group. Joe Johnston
Keyword details
Total words: 2,871
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
84% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.8% percentile 5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 39.0% 39.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 20.7% 20.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 17.7% 17.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 39.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 20.7%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.3%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 17.7%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst