Keyword summary
48%1 analyzed article/video798 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jerry Nadler results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 1,763 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,394 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 58% (15,882 of 37,533 keywords). This Jerry Nadler is worse (more manipulative) than 57.70% of the peer group.
Jerry Nadler
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
58%Jerry Nadler (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,394
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

58% percentile
025507510057.7% percentile
3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.9%10.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 6.4%6.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos