Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 592 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeremiah Smith results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , In-Group Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38% saturation with 899 hits . Analysis detected 4,800 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,525 of 37,536 keywords). This Jeremiah Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 85.30% of the peer group. Jeremiah Smith
Keyword details
Total words: 2,368
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.3% percentile 5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 38.0% 38.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 17.2% 17.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 38.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.9%, sitewide 19.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Straw Man: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst