Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video769 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jenifer Rajkumar results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 453 hits. Analysis detected 2,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,076 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,522 of 37,536 keywords). This Jenifer Rajkumar is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group.
Jenifer Rajkumar
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
56%Jenifer Rajkumar (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,076
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510056.0% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.7%14.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos