Keyword summary
â 8% 1 analyzed article/video 1,397 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jeffrey Chapman results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 528 hits . Analysis detected 2,360 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,588 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of â 6% (35,621 of 37,536 keywords). This Jeffrey Chapman is better (less manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group. Jeffrey Chapman
Keyword details
Total words: 5,588
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.1% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst