Keyword summary
44%1 analyzed article/video756 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jay Coons results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 481 hits. Analysis detected 2,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,024 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,999 of 37,536 keywords). This Jay Coons is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group.
Jay Coons
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
53%Jay Coons (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,024
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510052.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.9%15.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos