Keyword summary
86%2 analyzed articles/videos1,484 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Altmire results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17% saturation with 759 hits. Analysis detected 4,259 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,452 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,856 of 37,536 keywords). This Jason Altmire is better (less manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group.
Jason Altmire
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
40%Jason Altmire (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,452
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510039.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate