Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jane Macdougall results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 272 hits . Analysis detected 2,595 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,732 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (31,520 of 36,899 keywords). This Jane Macdougall is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. Jane Macdougall
Keyword details
Total words: 4,732
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Horn Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst