Keyword summary
62% 1 analyzed article/video 285 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jamf results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Unattributed Quote , and Status Quo Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 285 hits . Analysis detected 1,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,140 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,509 of 36,471 keywords). This Jamf is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the peer group. Jamf
Keyword details
Total words: 1,140
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.9% percentile 4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 25.0% 25.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Keyword 25.0%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 1.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst