Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video832 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Van Der Beek results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.4% saturation with 1,184 hits. Analysis detected 6,288 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,496 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of 96% (1,580 of 37,536 keywords). This James Van Der Beek is worse (more manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group.
James Van Der Beek
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
96%James Van Der Beek (selected)11%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,496
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

96% percentile
025507510095.8% percentile
11.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 47.4%47.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 24.8%24.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 31.7%31.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 42.0%42.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 18.0%18.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.5%5.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 47.4%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 42.0%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 31.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 24.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 18.0%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 2.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos