Keyword summary
76% 3 analyzed articles/videos 463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Boasberg results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 36% saturation with 1,116 hits . Analysis detected 3,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,102 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,358 of 35,675 keywords). This James Boasberg is worse (more manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. James Boasberg
Keyword details
Total words: 3,102
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.6% percentile 4.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 36.0% 36.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.8% 24.8% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.5% 6.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 36.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Primacy Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst