Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 586 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jalen Smith results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 405 hits . Analysis detected 2,826 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,758 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.3% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,510 of 35,668 keywords). This Jalen Smith is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group. Jalen Smith
Keyword details
Total words: 1,758
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 90.2% percentile 7.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 23.0% 23.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 17.2% 17.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 22.7%, sitewide 26.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 4.0% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 6.9% Recency Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst