Keyword summary
26% 1 analyzed article/video 679 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jade Carey results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Recency Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7% saturation with 189 hits . Analysis detected 1,081 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,716 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 25% (42,311 of 56,030 keywords). This Jade Carey is better (less manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Jade Carey
Keyword details
Total words: 2,716
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst