Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video401 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jack Nicklaus results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 44.1% saturation with 707 hits. Analysis detected 3,129 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,604 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 86% (5,206 of 36,204 keywords). This Jack Nicklaus is worse (more manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Jack Nicklaus
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
86%Jack Nicklaus (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,604
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510085.6% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 44.1%44.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 21.3%21.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.5%17.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 19.9%19.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 9.6%9.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 7.0%7.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 44.1%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 19.9%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.5%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 7.5%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Special Pleading: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.3%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos