Keyword summary
⁠83%1 analyzed article/video1,228 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Israeli Defense Forces results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 850 hits. Analysis detected 6,670 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,912 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (10,609 of 49,111 keywords). This Israeli Defense Forces is worse (more manipulative) than 78.40% of the peer group.
Israeli Defense Forces
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,912
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

78% percentile
025507510078.4% percentile
4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.2%8.2%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.8%12.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos