Keyword summary
51% 1 analyzed article/video 491 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ismael Zambada Garcia results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 304 hits . Analysis detected 1,043 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,473 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (13,723 of 34,568 keywords). This Ismael Zambada Garcia is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Ismael Zambada Garcia
Keyword details
Total words: 1,473
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.3% percentile 3.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.6% 20.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst