Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video612 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isap results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 539 hits. Analysis detected 4,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,448 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 90% (4,069 of 37,530 keywords). This Isap is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Isap
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
90%Isap (selected)7%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,448
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

89% percentile
025507510089.2% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 19.3%19.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 22.0%22.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 18.2%18.2%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 9.1%9.1%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 22.0%, sitewide 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 19.3%, sitewide 2.0%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.2%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Circular Reasoning: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos