Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Iran Vance Trump Nuclear Negotiations results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Recency Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 658 hits . Analysis detected 2,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,828 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Iran Vance Trump Nuclear Negotiations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Iran Vance Trump Nuclear Negotiations
Keyword details
Total words: 3,828
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst